Showing posts with label community health. Show all posts
Showing posts with label community health. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 28, 2018

Growing Environmental Public Health Challenges

Megan Hatch, MPH 
Research Associate 


Environmental public health covers a vast area, from the air humans breathe to the way industrialization effects the communities we live in and the food we eat. There are two branches that are particularly of growing concern to Massachusetts however: rising temperatures and water levels.  As an organization committed to public and community health, the Institute for Community Health (ICH) is concerned about the damages occurring because of climate change.  Some of these issues are described below.

Rising Temperatures:
Massachusetts has seen some warm temperatures during the recent winter. While some might enjoy these warmer temperatures, the warmth can support disease transmission, particularly of Lyme disease. When winter temperatures are warm, fewer ticks die, resulting in more ticks alive to carry Lyme disease and transmit it to humans1. Massachusetts is already a hotbed for ticks, with 4518 confirmed and probable cases of Lyme reported in MA in 20162. Lyme disease can cause significant morbidity in life, including fatigue, swollen joints, and even cognitive decline3. Lyme has been a public health issue for decades, and an increase in temperatures should cause states to re-evaluate the type of educational programs and screening mechanisms that are currently in use. 

Along with expanded timeframes for vectors to spread disease, rising temperatures can also give way to heat waves, which increase the incidence of heat stroke. Heat stroke is a condition characterized by the body’s inability to regulate its own temperature4. Cities have seen rises in death rates during heat waves in the past few years4. Cities are in a unique position during heatwaves, as they are hotter than surrounding rural areas, due to the Urban Heat Island Effect5. The danger of heat in cities has caused some, such as Chicago, to implement targeted outreach to vulnerable neighborhoods, as a preventative measure before heatwaves6.


 Water Levels:
Water is another facet of environmental public health that is of concern. Access to water due to droughts is a growing problem across the world7, and so is flooding due to sea level rise. Massachusetts is in a bit of a precarious position when it comes to flooding, a 2016 study predicted8. Due to a combination of gravitational pull on the ocean, South Pole ice melt, and sinking of the Northeast, East Coast cities could have a 25% higher increase in sea level than other areas of the planet8. Flooding due to seawater rise, but also heavy downpours, can be vehicles for waterborne illnesses, such as cryptosporidiosis and campylobacteriosis, among many others9.
The danger is not over once floodwaters recede or heavy rainfalls stop, however. The water-soaked items left in floodwater’s wake are perfect for growing mold and harboring other bacteria that can make humans sick. A study done after in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina looked at asthma rates in children. While mold is commonly a trigger for asthma and a concern after water damage, the study also considered stress after a traumatizing event as a trigger for asthmatic children10. This crossover from strictly environmental factors such as bacteria, viruses, and mold, to behavioral risk factors (stress), caused by environmental factors like flooding, highlights that public health does not exist in a vacuum and all parts of human health can be influenced by environmental public health. Large swaths of the greater Boston area (including Malden, Cambridge, Revere, Chelsea, and Winthrop) are all in the predicted flood zone of the below model11. The position of these communities means public health agencies should look into needs assessments, and public health prevention efforts, to be prepared should a flood ever occur. Boston and Revere have already seen a taste of coastal flooding in January, due to Winter Storm Grayson12
*2050 sea level rise + Major storm. Boston could experience 7 feet of flooding (2 feet of sea level rise + 5 feet of storm surge = 7 feet of flooding). Data from http://seachange.sasaki.com

As mentioned before, the various sections of public health do not occur in a vacuum. In 2015, Researchers published their findings that refugees (due to civil war or other conflicts) experience health disparities at a greater rate than other populations13. On the horizon is a new type of refugee: climate refugees, people who have been forced out of their homes by environmental factors. Like other refugees, they will face barriers to health equity, and the field of public health will need to add resources to addressing these challenges.
For all public health issues mentioned above, it is important to note that children, communities of color, and low-income communities are usually more heavily affected than other demographics.
Need for evaluation, research and assessment:
            As public health departments, cities, towns, and hospitals encounter these new challenges caused by environmental factors, they will need to undertake needs assessments to inform the type of programs that would benefit their populations. Additionally, once programs are in place, they will need to be evaluated to ensure they are meeting the population’s needs, and to seek out areas of improvement. ICH has worked with local public health departments, the Massachusetts Department of Public Health, and hospitals in the past, working with a variety of data, from medical records claims, to the YBRS for social behavioral risk factors for health. As such, ICH’s previous work puts us in an excellent position to help other public health agencies plan, evaluate, and improve programs to reach their climate-change preparedness goals. 

Sources:



Tuesday, January 16, 2018

What is being done about the opioid epidemic at a national, state, and local level


Elaine Zhang, BS
Research Associate 

The rise in pain killer prescriptions from doctors combined with aggressive marketing campaigns from large pharmaceutical companies in the 1990’s awakened a tsunami of addiction that has swept through the US resulting in significant increase in opioid drug overdose death rates. From 2000 to 2015 more than half a million people died from a drug overdose.1  Since 2011, the rate of drug overdose deaths due to opioid prescriptions started to level out while death rate due to heroin overdose experienced a sharp increase, see graph below. In 2016, roughly 64,000 people died due to drug overdoses making it the leading cause of death for Americans under 50 years old.2

Massachusetts is experiencing the opioid epidemic at a much higher rate than the rest of US. In 2014, Massachusetts’s age adjusted overdose death rate was 23.3 per 100,000 which is more than doubled the national rate of 9.6 per 100,0003. In 2017, there were 932 confirmed opioid related deaths in Massachusetts; 76% of deaths were male and 24% were female.4 The opioid epidemic also affects the white non-Hispanic population at a much higher rate than any other race. Of the 932 confirmed opioid-related deaths in 2017, 81% or 753 of those deaths were of people of white non-Hispanic race/ethnicity. This group has historically had higher death rates than any other race/ethnic group in the past three years4, see graph below. 

At a county level, certain counties are experiencing higher opioid overdose death rates than other ones. Barnstable, Berkshire, Bristol, Duke, Essex, Norfolk, Plymouth, and Worcester counties currently have the highest opioid overdose death rate,5 see map below. 


In October 2017, the president declared the opioid epidemic a national public health emergency. The Department of Health and Human Services has outlined a five-point strategy to combat the opioid epidemic:
1.       Improving access to treatment and recovery services
2.       Promoting use of overdose reversing drugs
3.       Strengthening our understanding of the epidemic through better public health surveillance
4.       Providing support for cutting edge research on pain and addiction
5.       Advancing better practices for pain management.
The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) awarded $28.6 million in funds to 44 states and the District of Columbia to help strengthen prevention efforts and better understand the epidemic through public health data6, which aligns with part of the HHS five point strategy.

In 2015, Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker signed Chapter 55 into law in response to the opioid epidemic. The new law allowed different government data sets to be analyzed to help guide policy decisions and better understand the opioid epidemic.7 The Baker administration also allocated $34.5 million to combat the opioid epidemic through raising awareness, increasing prevention, and providing education. Recent data shows that in the first 9 months of 2017 there were 167 fewer opioid related overdose deaths when compared to the first 9 months of 2016, a 10% drop in deaths.8 Along with the decrease in deaths, there has also been a 30% decrease in the number of patients who were prescribed an opioid in the third quarter of 2017 when compared to the first quarter of 2015.8

At ICH, we work on several projects that focus on the opioid substance use disorders. SUSTAIN Communities Evaluation is an initiative funded by the GE Foundation with support from Partners HealthCare. SUSTAIN Communities provide grants and technical assistance to community health centers to build capacity for Medication Assisted Treatment (MAT) for patients with opioid use disorder.  ICH Assistant Director of Research, Leah Zallman, MD, MPH, works on a project funded by a small foundation (McManus) that uses electronic health record data to understand the relationship between opioid prescriptions and the development of opioid abuse disorder. ICH is looking into Cambridge Health Alliance data among patients who have ever been prescribed opioids and tracking how many developed opioid use disorders, how long it took, and what are the clinical predictors. Promoting Older Women’s Engagement in Recovery (POWER) is a collaborative project aimed at the prevention of opioid misuse in older women ages 55 or older in Cambridge and Somerville. The Institute for Health and Recovery received the grant and works alongside with Cambridge Health Alliance, Somerville Cambridge Elder Services, and the Cambridge Council on Aging to address the risk factors of opioid misuse among older women through technical assistance for partnership sites and direct support groups for women 55+. ICH is the evaluator on the project.

If you or someone you know is struggling with addition, there are some resources available to help. The Massachusetts SubstanceAbuse Information and Education Helpline provides free and confidential information and referrals for alcohol and other drug abuse problems. The Institute for Health and Recovery helps families and youth with substance abuse issues access publicly funded services. The Suboxone Hotline Office Based Opioid Treatment Program at Boston Medical Center provides referrals and information on opiate and heroin treatments available at doctor’s offices statewide. Cambridge Health Alliance offers an outpatient addiction service which helps adults to and maintain sobriety. The Fresh Start Alcohol and Drug Recovery Group is an anonymous peer support group that meets on Thursday evenings at CHA Revere Care Center. Smart Recovery is a scientifically tested program for adults who want to manage their addiction and is held every Tuesday evening at CHA Everett Care Center.

Below are the numbers for each helpline:
The Massachusetts Substance Abuse Information and Education Helpline:
Phone Toll Free: 1-800-327-5050
TTY: 1-888-448-8321

The Institute for Health and Recovery:
Phone: 1-866-705-2807
TTY: 1-617-661-9051

Suboxone Hotline Office Based Opioid Treatment Program at BMC:
Phone: 1-866-414-6926 or 1-617-414-6926


Sources:

Wednesday, January 18, 2017

Exploring Trends in Your Local YRBS or Student Health Survey Data

By Lisa N. Arsenault, PhD and Stefanie Albert, MPH

 
The CDC’s Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBS) has provided data on health-related behaviors of U.S. high school students for over 25 years.  Results have been used to monitor progress toward national health objectives and to support the modification or development of programs and policies that promote health among high school aged youth.

Individual school districts across the country have recognized the utility and power this type of data provides and many choose to implement local-level versions of the YRBS (or other similar type of student health survey).  Most districts hire external contractors or organizations to conduct the data cleaning and analyses of their local data. Many districts also use external contractors to generate summary reports, tables, and charts.  But even with external help it can be overwhelming to decide how best to examine the results.

 Here we briefly illustrate one of the most powerful ways to explore student health survey data, the trend over time. Our goal is to provide some useful suggestions for exploring and reporting data from your own surveys so that you can be better informed on the health needs of your students. 

 Example 1:  The Basic Trend

Here is a simple table of results that shows the rate of one risk behavior among all students over three different years.  In this format it is easy to see and report if the rate of the behavior is increasing or decreasing over time. In our example, the rate of marijuana use in the prior 30 days has declined from nearly 27% in 2012 to about 19% in 2016.   


You can also visualize this data in a very simple bar chart, as shown below. You can opt to add some text boxes that highlight extra information that might be important for your audience to understand about the data such as the state rate, total number of students surveyed, etc. 

In this example, we added the approximate number of students the current year’s rate represents.  We find this is often helpful when trend data show a decrease over time because it’s easy to forget you are talking about actual students in your school.  So highlighting how many students are still at risk is a good way to balance the ‘big picture’ with the real personal value of the data. 



 Examining the overall trend in your data is absolutely the essential first step.  However, the trend you see might not represent what is going on for all sub-populations of students!  For this reason, we highly recommend exploring and comparing the trends among sub-groups of students to gain a more accurate picture of the health of your student population. 

 
Example 2:  Trend by Sub-Group

Here is a second table of results that shows the rate of one risk behavior over three different years and stratified by grade level. In this format it is easy to see and report if the rate of the behavior is increasing or decreasing for each sub-group.  In our example, the rate of marijuana use in the prior 30 days has steadily declined between 2012 and 2016 for 9th and 12th grade students.  But the rate has increased since 2012 among 11th graders and it has increased since 2014 for 10th grade students.  Had we stopped exploring our data after looking at the overall trend, we would have missed this very important finding!

 

Visualizing the trends by sub-group can really help you ‘see’ the differences, particularly when many years of data make reading summary tables full of numbers more difficult. In our example below, the dramatic drop in 30-Day marijuana use among 9th graders is very clear.  Likewise, you can easily see the steady decline in use among 12th graders.  And the less encouraging results for the 10th and 11th grade students are shown in a more understandable way that can foster discussion with stakeholders or audiences. 
 
 

 Trend data is one of the most powerful ways to explore your student health survey data.  But overall trends may be hiding some very important differences between sub-groups of students.  At ICH we always encourage school districts to look at data trends by grade level and by gender.  Additionally, for districts with a diverse student population looking at data by race/ethnicity is also important.  Ultimately, the goal of collecting YRBS or student health survey data is to inform programs and policies that will improve the health and wellbeing of all students.  We hope that our suggestions here will help you achieve that goal.   

 
*********************

 ICH has supported the development and implementation of both middle school and high school student health surveys in multiple school districts in MA. We have also provided technical assistance to numerous school districts, public health agencies, and substance abuse coalitions around the analysis, interpretation, and dissemination of survey results.  Our goal is always to aim for results that are understandable, useful, and actionable and this has led us to explore many different ways to visualize student health survey results over the years.

 

Tuesday, February 11, 2014

ICH Volunteer Day

By Nazmim Bhuiya

On January 17th, ICH held our inaugural Volunteer Day at Cradles to Crayons (C2C) in Brighton. C2C is dedicated to providing children from birth to age 12, living in low-income and homeless situations, with the essential items they need to thrive - at home, at school and at play. At their Giving Factory, we sorted through and checked the quality of donated clothes, shoes, books, toys, and other necessary items and put together outfits for children. Together we were able to make a difference for almost 200 children across the state!

It was a great opportunity to roll up our sleeves and volunteer at Cradles to Crayons!

“I had a great time putting together outfits for baby boys in need - this was especially fun for me as I am expecting a baby boy in just a few weeks! I was very impressed with the care that Cradles to Crayons takes to make sure that children receive high-quality items, and I would love to volunteer there again in the future.” – Ranjani Paradise, ICH Research Associate II

“This was a great opportunity to step away from my desk for one morning and take a more hands on approach to making a difference in the community. I was amazed by how quickly time passed as I created outfits for young girls, and how many children we were collectively able to impact in such a short span of time.” – Reann Gibson, ICH Research Associate I


“We had a great time at the triage station where we sorted through all the donation items. It was good to work with colleagues outside of the office and also having an opportunity to give back to our community collectively as an organization.” – Nazmim Bhuiya, ICH Research Associate II

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The views expressed on the Institute for Community Health blog page are solely those of the blog post author(s), and do not necessarily reflect the views of ICH, the author’s employer or other organizations with which the author is associated.

Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Using the Census to Make Sense of Your Community

    By Lisa Arsenault, PhD, Shalini Tendulkar, ScD, ScM, Nazmim Bhuiya, MPH, Kelly Washburn, MPH, Lise Fried, DSc, MS

The first population census of the United States was conducted back in 1790 when the population was just under 4 million.  The US Census Bureau has come a long way since those early days, yet the images that come to mind are still probably pretty archaic — data enumerators going from door to door with pencils and clip boards and maybe even on horseback in the early years!  Well today the Bureau works like a well-oiled machine, coordinating a monthly data collection of 250,000 households via mailed questionnaires, computer assisted telephone interviews, and in-person interviews.  This data (called the American Community Survey or ACS) is combined to give us very detailed estimates each year of who is living in the US.  In contrast, the decennial census (conducted every 10 years) collects only basic information on gender, race/ethnicity, household composition, and housing tenure.    

Recent news that the US House of Representative voted to cut funding for the ACS (and the Economic Census) may lead you to conclude that the data from such surveys cannot be that informative or useful.  However, nothing can be further from the truth, particularly for those of us working with communities and public health-related programs at the local level!  US Census Bureau Director, Robert M. Groves, does a wonderful job explaining the impact of the proposed defunding in his Director’s Blog.  Here we hope to highlight several examples of how the Institute for Community Health has used data from the American Community Survey to support the work of our community partners and further research into the health of local populations.

One nearly universal topic of interest is poverty.  The ACS is one of the primary sources for poverty data and we work on this topic frequently.  Recently, ICH pulled together a presentation for the Community Affairs Department of Cambridge Health Alliance that included the proportion of individuals living below the poverty line in Cambridge, Chelsea, Everett, Revere, and Somerville, MA.  We paired the data with information that ICH had collected on the weight status of adults in these cities and were able to illustrate a relationship between poverty and obesity at the population level.  The data provided a catalyst for the Community Affairs group to begin discussions related to food justice within their service communities.
Census data is also an integral part of our work as evaluators of public health programs.  The Massachusetts Alliance on Teen Pregnancy’s Youth First Initiative is currently testing community-wide approaches to reducing teen pregnancy in Springfield and Holyoke, MA.

As evaluators of their efforts, ICH has pulled data from the ACS to determine the number and proportion of teens residing in each city by census tract.  This data will be mapped and overlaid with the locations of the community health centers that have partnered with MATP on the project.  This information will provide Youth First with invaluable information on where the at-risk population resides within the community and how well the clinical providers are geographically positioned to serve the target population.   Such information can help a program evaluate and target their efforts, use resources more efficiently, and achieve a greater impact on a community’s health.


Finally, we frequently use census data to more generally describe a community’s population and its changes over time.  ICH supported the data efforts of the “Well Being of Somerville Report 2011” which was released last fall by the Somerville Health Agenda at Cambridge Health Alliance.  Using census data, we were able to describe the current population of Somerville, MA and show how the population’s characteristics have changed over the past decade.  Indicators including age, race/ethnicity, poverty, housing, language, country of origin, income, and educational attainment were all obtained from the US Census and ACS for Somerville.  And importantly, these indicators are all considered ‘determinants of health’ or factors in peoples lives that can affect one’s health in positive and/or negative ways.  Collecting these types of data and examining them alongside other types or sources of data yield great insight into the assets a community possesses as well as the challenges it may face from a public health perspective.  Overall, the this report is currently serving as a tool for local leaders and stakeholders to determine the public health needs of Somerville and inspire future planning efforts in the city.

We hope you’ve been impressed by how integral the data from the US Census Bureau is to what we do to improve health.  Our community partners rely on these data to inform their efforts — whether spurring new conversations, planning and targeting programmatic activities, or generally assessing the characteristics of a community.  There simply is no substitute for the American Community Survey.   And the most amazing part?   The data are there, right now, available online to anyone who is interested in learning about their own community.  Check it out!

______________________________________________________
The views expressed on the Institute for Community Health blog page are solely those of the blog post author(s), and do not necessarily reflect the views of ICH, the author’s employer or other organizations with which the author is associated.